However, in exchange, the heel was left “airless”. So the Zoom Air unit made its way in the forefoot section for the Freak 2. Did Nike listen to us, consumers, on this one? Yes, they did. That was the only big issue I had with the Zoom Freak 1. Obviously, that doesn’t add any big value to the performance sheet, but it definitely does feel & look more premium.Ī double-stacked Zoom Air unit in the heel without having one in the forefoot didn’t make sense to me. Therefore, not only creating quite a big real estate for sick designs but also quietly being a strong structure for sustainable lateral coverage.Ĭontinuing with side paneling, the inner one is made from synthetic leather or nubuck to be more precise, rather than mesh on the Freak 1. As a result, the swoosh is covering pretty much the whole outer side panel. Nike got rid of that reversed swoosh for the Freak 2 and went for a classic look that we all are familiar with. Yeah, but that also means less rigidity on the sides, right? Well, that would have been true if not for the replaced swoosh logo. That means improved pliability, as well as more free-flowing sensation for the toe section. The mesh paneling that makes for the main body construction got rid of that plastic spider web-like overlay found on the predecessor. Materials haven’t changed vastly from the original model. Sheesh… That’s a heck of a year.īut while the Greek Freak is putting the league on notice, let’s see if the new Nike Zoom Freak 2 can make some noise in the sneaker world too. I would guess Giannis probably isn’t completely pessimistic about this year as most of the world winning a consecutive MVP trophy and getting his second signature sneaker.
0 kommentar(er)
